Skip to main content

Ballot Measure #2 - Establishment of an Alaska Coastal Management Program (full text, proposed bill language)

Voting day tomorrow.

Scroll down for the proposed bill language as provided by the petition sponsors in .pdf.

Ballot Measure #2
Establishment of an Alaska Coastal Management Program

This bill would create the Alaska Coastal Management Program in the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development (“the Department”).  The program would develop new state and local standards to review projects in coastal areas of the State.  These standards and new permitting procedures would be in addition to existing state and federal permitting requirements.  Projects requiring state or federal permits would be reviewed under the program.  The program would not become entirely effective until approval of these new state and local standards by the U.S. Department of Commerce under the federal Coastal Zone Management Act.

The bill creates a Coastal Policy Board.  The board would have 13 members appointed by the governor.  Nine would be members of the public from coastal areas. 4 would be state commissioners.  The board would coordinate agencies for coastal and ocean planning.  The board would work with agencies to develop and implement the program.  The board would also review, approve, and evaluate coastal district management plans (“district plans”).  The board would direct the Department to apply for funding.  The board would review and approve regulations.  Board members could receive per diem and travel expenses.

The bill sets out 9 coastal districts.  Each district would adopt a district plan.  District plans would need board approval.  To be approved, the district plan must comply with the bill’s provisions and regulations approved by the board.  Each district plan would set boundaries for the coastal area subject to the district plan.  District plans would define the land and water uses subject to the district plan’s requirements.  District plans would also set special management areas and enforceable policies.  The bill sets standards for district enforceable policies.  The bill defines when an enforceable policy is pre-empted by existing state or federal law.

The bill would restore coastal districts, boundaries, and district plans that were in effect on June 30, 2011 under the prior coastal management program.  Coastal districts would have to review their prior district plans and submit any needed changes for board approval.  Coastal districts with zoning or land use authority would use those powers to apply their district plans.  Otherwise, state agencies would put the district plan into effect.  Local and state agencies would regulate uses to conform to the district plans.  The superior court could enforce board or department orders.

The bill would also create the Division of Ocean and Coastal Management in the Department.  This division would issue state consistency determinations and respond to federal consistency determinations and certifications.  It would adopt board-approved regulations.  It would also give planning and management information to coastal districts.  The division would create a financial aid program to help coastal districts create and effect their district plans.

The bill sets goals for the program.  These goals include (1) management goals for coastal uses and resources; (2) the coordination of coastal planning among government and citizens; (3) public and government participation in the program; and (4) require state agencies to comply with the program.

The bill requires that regulations be adopted.  The regulations would be approved by the board and then issued by the division.  They would set state coastal standards, district plan requirements, and consistency review procedures.

The bill would allow regional education attendance areas (“REAAs”) in the unorganized borough to be used as Coastal Resource Service Areas (“CRSAs”).  CRSAs would act through a board and function like coastal districts.  The Department could combine or divide REAAs into CRSAs under set conditions.  A coastal city could also be included in a CRSA under set conditions.  CRSAs could also be created by voters or by a voter-approved city or village council decision.  Service areas would elect boards with seven members.  The State would run and fund CRSA board elections.  Under some circumstances, board members could be appointed.  Board members could be recalled.  They could receive per diem and travel expenses.  If voters fail to create a needed service area, the Department could create a district plan for the area to submit to the legislature.  Under set conditions, the Department could complete a district plan for a CRSA.  The bill creates a development, approval and implementation process for district plans in service areas.

 The bill sets out rules of construction and defines 16 terms.

 Should this initiative become law?  __YES      __NO

Proposed bill language as provided by the petition sponsors

Popular posts from this blog

F/V Northern Leader. Launch. January 26, 2013 (video)

EXTRA :  Wave of new vessels will boost Alaska, Washington shipyards MOLLY DISCHNER, ALASKA JOURNAL OF COMMERCE Jan 24, 2013 - 10:53 AM AKST Alaska’s fishing fleets are aging, but new vessels are making their way onto the water. According to the National Marine Fisheries Service, 1,646 fishing vessels participated in federal fisheries offshore from Alaska in 2010. The majority — more than 900 — were built in the 1970s and 1980s. The first new vessels operating in Alaska waters will be longliners fishing in the Bering Sea with Alaskan Leader Fisheries’ Northern Leader and Alaska Longline Co.’s Arctic Prowler scheduled to start fishing this spring. Alaskan Leader Fisheries is jointly owned by the Alaska Leader Group of Lynden, Wash., and Dillingham-based Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp. BBEDC is one of six Western Alaska Community Development Quota, or CDQ, groups that receive a 10 percent annual share of the Bering Sea harvests. Petersburg-based Alaska Longline Co. al

Crabbers get a boost in bairdi Tanner quotas

LAINE WELCH Image via Wikipedia FISHERIES Published: November 7th, 2009 10:10 PM Last Modified: November 7th, 2009 10:12 PM KODIAK -- Kodiak and Alaska Peninsula crabbers got some good news last week -- bigger catch quotas for bairdi Tanner crab, a mid-January fishery important to local economies. Bairdi are the larger cousins of the better-known opilio Tanners, or snow crab. The bairdi boost stems from a big pulse of new crab recruits that biologists have been tracking for years. "That is what's fueling the increase in the harvest this year. We're just getting the very beginning of that year class," said......... http://www.adn.com/money/welch/story/1004091.html

Tender "Lonestar" rolls over in the Mouth of the Igushik River (fishery closed)

The Tender "Lonestar" has Capsized in the Mouth of the Igushik River 2:00 PM SUN JUNE 30, 2013 By MIKE MASON A large vessel, used to transport sockeye salmon from the fishing grounds to a processing facility, has capsized in the mouth of one of the major salmon producing rivers in Bristol Bay. KDLG’s Mike Mason has the details.... http://kdlg.org/post/tender-lonestar-has-capsized-mouth-igushik-river SUNDAY, JUNE 30, 2013 Trouble in Bristol Bay The Alaska Department of Fish and Game shut down the local setnet fishery after a salmon tender, the Lonestar, sank this morning in the mouth of the Igushik River....... http://deckboss.blogspot.com/2013/06/trouble-in-bristol-bay.html Coast Guard responding to partially submerged vessel near Dillingham, Alaska Date: June 30, 2013 District 17 Public Affairs Detachment Kodiak KODIAK, Alaska — The Coast Guard is responding to the sinking of a fishing vessel near the mouth of the Igushik River, Sunday. The Coast Guard is de